阅读下面的短文，请根据短文后的要求答题(请注意问题后的字数要求)

An American friend of mine who was high up in a big corporation had worked out a way of heading a good of e-mails before most of us bad, even heard of the concept. If any information he was sent was vital enough, his back of response would ensure the sender rang him up, if the sender wasn't important enough to have his private numbers the communication couldn't be that important. My friend is now even more senior in the same company, so the strategy must work.

Almost every week now there seems to be a report suggesting that we are all being driven crazy by the bother of e-mail. If this is the case, it's only because we haven't developed an appropriate in dealing with it.

________ Firstly. You junk nothing with an exclamation mark on a string of capital letters, or from my adders, you don't recognize on feel confident about.

Secondly, e-mail don't and have to be answered. Because e-mail is so easy, there's a tendency for correspondence to carry on for ever, but it is permissible to stop an endless discussion or to accept a point of information sent by a colleague without acknowledging it.

Thirdly, a reply e-mail thoughts have to be the same length as the original. We all have e-mail pals who read long, chatty e-mail, which are nice to receive, but who then expect an equally long reply. The chart of e-mail can consist in the simple, incomplete sentence, totally regardless of the format of the bread of the letter meat by past. You are perfectly within the bounds of polyandrous in responding to a marathon e-mail with a better reply.